The sixth theme of the course was about “Qualitative and case study
research” and this time we had to prepare by reading "Building Theories
from Case Study Research” by Eisenhardt. In addition, we had to select a media
technology research paper using qualitative methods, where I chose “Self-presentation
and hiring recommendations in online communities: Lessons from LinkedIn” by
Johannes Kuo-Huie Chiang and Hung-Yue Suen and a paper that is using the case
study research method, where I chose “Structuring the discourse on social
networks for learning: Case studies on blogs and microblogs” by Aline M.
Marques, Rafael Krejci, Sean W.M. Siqueira, Mariano Pimentel and Maria Helena
L.B. Braz. After already discussing quantitative methods I found it interesting
to finally gather in-depth knowledge about qualitative methods and the case
study research.
Unfortunately the lecture for theme six was cancelled on short-notice
and hence we only had the seminar group left in order discuss our thoughts
gathered after the readings. It would have been nice to listen to the expertise
of the lecturer in order to combine the thoughts of the read and the heard. In
the majority of the previous themes the lecture really helped to get new
insights and a broader understanding of the theme.
As we already discussed qualitative methods quite a lot during the theme
of quantitative methods to get the counter characteristics of them, Ilias Bergström
encouraged us to focus on the case study research during our discussion. Due to
the absence of the lecture this made also sense to me as I didn’t acquire any
further insights about qualitative methods worthwhile discussing. During the
seminar we presented our chosen articles to each other and used the table of
"Process of Building Theory from Case Study Research" as evaluation
guideline in order to determine if the respective case study research was done
in a proper way and where the strengths and weaknesses were. It was very
interesting to see how each of us found further strengths and weaknesses after
discussing the research paper openly with the group.Case studies are furthmore cyclical and hence revolving around a
specific context, i.e. case studies occuring in cycles. This means that a result of a case study research can cause another research with the result as a starting point. In my opinion the most
important about case study research is that there are no clear guidelines when creating a case study. The purpose of a case study is to build a theory
rather than test a theory, i.e. investigating an unknown field in order to find
enough to build a theory, which can be tested on a later stage. Hence, case
study research is a form of research where a hypothesis is actually not needed
as a hypothesis can be a result of a case study. In my opinion the seminar group really helped to have a better understanding what a case study actually is and what isn't as this quite was hard to me to seperate a case study from the other research methods.
Hi,
AntwortenLöschenI think that you have written a good explanation of the purposes/benefits of a case study. Furthermore I had not thought about case studies being “cyclical” before, and this was an interesting perspective.
I agree with your thoughts on what a case study is. And I think that you have made a good point in that a case study can be used in order to do research in an “unknown field”. I also interpreted this to be one of the more characteristic benefits of a case study.
Great reflection, with a clear explanation on case studies!
Thanks a lot for sharing your thoughts! In this blog post I enjoyed that you give your honest opinion about the canceled lecture. I agree with you that they have always been very hepful. I agree with you that a case study does not seek out to address specific hypothesis. I think that it helps to enter into an area where you know too little and want to find out more. During the discussion in the seminar, one person gave an example when a case study was useful: A paper about internet addiction in the year 2000 in which surveys and interviews were used. The person explained that it was a good example of trying to find out if something is there or not. What are your thoughts on this? Well done!
AntwortenLöschenVery interesting to read your reflection about theme 6 and to dive into your understanding of a case study! Indeed, a lecture would have been great to verify some issues we might have had about case studies, a topic I for my part have never had to think about so in-depth. I also wondered how it would be possible in research to follow no guideline at all, since argumentatively, can it then still be research? As we also read about the steps in the setup of a case study, I doubt that anything would be acceptable; apparently, you always have to follow at least a basic structure. Anyhow, I like that you emphasize the cycle of case studies and that the latter intend to build rather than test a theory - one of the most defining points. Enjoyed reading your post!
AntwortenLöschenHi! I enjoy reading your reflection. During the seminar we also mainly talked about case study. I thinks it's quite difficult to evaluate case study according to table of steps because as you've mentioned case study doesn't have clear structure. I like your conclusion about what case study is. After reading your post the definition of case study became more clear for me. Besides, I'd like to note that you've chosen very interesting case study about blogs and microbogs. Great job!
AntwortenLöschenGreat reflection! I can know you made a lot of contribution to this theme by reading your post. I agree with your opinion that there are no clear guidelines when creating a case study. The aim of case study is to find out something new, so existed guidelines absolutely useless for case study. You also solve my question about whether a hypothesis is needed in a case study or not. Thank you and good luck with last blog.
AntwortenLöschenI enjoyed reading your reflection it is quite detailed and you have covered all the important issues discussed in the seminar and in this week’s theme. I agree with you that the lecture would surely have been quite useful in solidifying some the key concepts of this week i.e. case study. I am glad the cyclical nature of case studies. I think it is quite important in the process of understanding what a case study is. I also agree that the purpose of a case study is to build theory . You have done a great job in summarizing the key concepts about this last theme.
AntwortenLöschen